Comparing Postoperative Pain After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.
نویسندگان
چکیده
who compared postoperative pain after traditional and single‑incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC), it was showed that SILC resulted in a slightly less immediate postoperative pain, but pain scores at 24 hours, 7 days, and 1–6 months after surgery were not different between the two operations. Many things of this study were well done. The authors used a double‑blinded, randomized, and controlled design. They chose a well‑validated endpoint of postoperative pain assessment: Visual analog scale (VAS). They had a large number of patients with a consistent operation and attempted to control most of the known factors affecting postoperative pain following cholecystectomy, such as age, gender, body mass index, type of surgery, and surgical complications. Furthermore, they openly discussed the limitations of their work. All of these are strengths in the study design. We can learn from their example. In our view, however, there were several important issues in this study that were not well addressed. First, the study subjects were patients with symptomatic gallstones or polyps documented by imaging. Actually, chronic abdominal pain is highly prevalent among these patients and can often cause psychological disorders, such as neuroticism, depression, and anxiety. It was unclear whether preoperative pain intensity, duration of pain, and pain‑related psychological morbidities were comparable between groups. It has been shown that a high preoperative gastrointestinal quality of life index score, episodic pain, and duration of pain of 1 year or less are associated with the postoperative absence of pain in patients undergoing cholecystectomy for uncomplicated symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. Furthermore, preoperative neuroticism, depression, and anxiety can significantly affect the postoperative pain severity determined by VAS. Second, the readers were not provided with detail of anesthesia and perioperative managements. The available literature indicates that preoperative single‑dose dexamethasone, wound infiltration of local anesthetic, subhepatic infiltration of local anesthetic, and combined wound and intraperitoneal use of local anesthetic can significantly reduce pain scores after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. For laparoscopic cholecystectomy, spinal anesthesia is associated with less early postoperative pain and lower incidence of postoperative complications than general anesthesia. [6] Moreover, we were very interested in knowing whether dose of opioid and analgesic drugs used during anesthesia were comparable between groups. When early postoperative pain between groups is compared, standardization of intraoperative use of opioid and analgesic drugs should be a crucial component of study design. For example, in patients scheduled for cholecystectomy under general anesthesia, intraoperative low‑dose ketamine infusion provides good postoperative analgesia and reduces …
منابع مشابه
تأثیر گاباپنتین بر درد بعد از جراحی کوله سیستکتومی
Background and purpose: Postoperative pain is the most common problem after elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This study assessed the effect of gabapentin on postoperative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Materials and methods: In this study 80 patients aged 20-60 (ASA class I, II) who were candidates for laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomized into two groups to receive gaba...
متن کاملComparing the Impact of Intraperitoneal Hydrocortisone With Bupivacaine on Postoperative Pain After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
BACKGROUND Postoperative pain is a major complaint following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to compare the impact of intraperitoneal hydrocortisone with intraperitoneal bupivacaine on pain relief after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS In a double blind clinical trial, 63 candidates for laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly allocated...
متن کاملبررسی اثر انفوزیون وریدی لیدوکائین حین عمل بر میزان درد بعد از عمل جراحی لاپاراسکوپیک کوله سیستکتومی
Background and Objective: Despite applying new drugs and techniques, many patients experience moderate to severe pain after surgery. Our goal in this study was to determine the effect of intravenous (IV) lidocaine infusion on postoperative pain in laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgery. Materials and Methods: In this double-blind clinical trial a total of 70 candidates for laparoscopic ch...
متن کاملA Review of Randomized Controlled Trials comparing Single Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy with Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Aim: To determine the safety and benefits of single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Materials and methods: A search for randomized controlled trials comparing single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy with conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy was conducted using Google scholar, HighPress and SCOPUS. Results: Single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy has a longer operating time, with equiv...
متن کاملIntraperitoneal Hydrocortisone plus Bupivacaine administration For Pain Relief after Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy, A Comparison with Bupivacaine Alone
Introduction: shorter hospital stay and less pain in comparison to open surgery considered to be major benefits for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. We compared the effect of intraperitoneal hydrocortisone plus bupivacaine with bupivacaine alone on pain relief following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods: Sixty two patients participated in this double-blind, randomized clinical trial. Pati...
متن کاملPatient controlled analgesia versus conventional analgesia for postoperative pain
Purpose: Patients may control postoperative pain by self-administration of intravenous opioids using devices designed for this purpose (patient controlled analgesia or PCA). This study set out to determine whether any of the two opioid administrations (i.e. PCA or conventional analgesia) would provide superior pain relief among patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy or not. ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Chinese medical journal
دوره 129 5 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2016